Sunday, September 23, 2007

War: What Casualties?

In the first three days of September, seven Americans have been killed in Iraq, but you would never know it from reading the Journal (J). US casualties have either gone unmentioned or were just one sentence buried in other stories. The history of the war, as told by the J, is almost completely missing. Afraid of the death, blood and pain of the war, the J refuses to show images that would document American and Iraqi deaths as well as the huge numbers of badly wounded and displaced. Why? The J follows the blind dictates of its antiquated, conservative publisher, a staunch Republican. Pictures might reveal the truth of this senseless, stupid, futile destruction of so many young people.

1 comments:

MrB said...

Indeed, and what brought the Vietnam war to an end? PICTURES. A picture is worth, well, you know. I'd love to see some honesty in reporting, some reality in our news. And I'm not talking just about this war. I don't care what your political bent is. Show _and_ tell. Let us see and read multiple perspectives from a myriad of sources. One can take this sort of look at any number of papers. The New York Post's screaming headline today, over a picture of Ahmedinajad, was EVIL WEASEL. Ripe for deconstruction, that one. Keep it up, McCannon!